England · Non League Premier - Northern
AFC Emley vs Workington Prediction
Match prediction
- The model's existing output names Workington as the winner with 50% probability, but the same 50% is assigned to the draw and 0% to AFC Emley, so the advice is better read as a two-way lean toward Workington or a draw rather than a confident away win; the comparison totals reinforce that split, with Workington at 73.80 versus Emley at 26.30 across form, attack, defence and Poisson inputs.
- Form is the clearest separator: Workington's comparison form score of 83.00 against Emley's 17.00 reflects a recent sequence of LLDLWWWWW, including four straight wins, while Emley's DLWWDDDLL includes three defeats in its last five; that recent divergence supports the Workington lean, though Emley's earlier unbeaten run shows the form line is not uniformly poor.
- The last-five records sharpen the contrast but also expose volatility: Emley lost 0-5 at Bootle, 0-4 at home to Spennymoor Town and 0-4 at Bury before a 2-0 win and a 1-1 draw, while Workington's only recent blemish is a 1-5 loss at Bury, surrounded by 3-1, 3-0, 3-0 and 3-2 wins; Workington's scoring consistency looks stronger, but the shared heavy defeat to Bury suggests both teams can be opened up.
- Goals analysis supports Workington's edge in output rather than a defensive lock: Workington average 1.90 goals scored and 1.70 conceded, with 17 scored and 15 against, while Emley average 0.90 scored and 1.70 conceded, with 8 scored and 15 against; Emley's attack score of 18.00 versus Workington's 82.00 captures that gap, and Emley's four failed-to-score matches in nine point to a blunt edge.
- Defensive metrics are less one-sided than the overall prediction implies: Emley's defence score of 35.00 is below Workington's 65.00, yet both teams have conceded 15 goals and both average 1.70 against per game, and Emley's away clean sheets (2) exceed Workington's total (1); this qualifies the Workington advice because the away side's defensive record is not clearly superior in raw goals conceded.
- The head-to-head section is empty, so there is no historical matchup evidence to confirm or contradict the model's Workington lean, and the goals comparison fields (goals_home 0.00, goals_away 0.00, h2h_home 0.00, h2h_away 0.00) add no independent signal; the prediction therefore rests mainly on form, attack and Poisson-style comparison scores, with the 50% draw probability acting as the main counterweight to the Workington advice.
- Predicted winner
- Workington
- Betting advice
- Winner : Workington
- Home win probability
- 0%
- Draw probability
- 50%
- Away win probability
- 50%
- Goals market
- —
Prediction comparison
| Factor | AFC Emley | Workington |
|---|---|---|
| Form | 17.0% | 83.0% |
| Attack | 18.0% | 82.0% |
| Defence | 35.0% | 65.0% |
| Poisson | 35.0% | 65.0% |
| H2h | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Goals | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Total | 26.3% | 73.8% |
Team form and goal analysis
AFC Emley
Recent form: DLWWDDDLL.
Average goals scored: 0.90 per match.
Workington
Recent form: LLDLWWWWW.
Average goals scored: 1.90 per match.
Head-to-head record
No recorded head-to-head matches are available.


